Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Vigneux Beaudry
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Guy Vigneux Beaudry
- Guy Vigneux Beaudry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO and WP:DIPLOMAT. previous AfDs have shown no inherent notability of ambassadors. Beaudry was a Chargé d'Affaires, which is a level lower than Ambassador. I could find no significant coverage of him. LibStar (talk) 02:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He was never a permanent ambassador, and only served as Chargé d'Affaires in one country. I can only find passing references to him, although he does appear to be a published author.[1]. Pburka (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.