Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurbakhsh Singh Kala Afgana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gurbakhsh Singh Kala Afgana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this page and its talk page sitting deleted under pages Kala Afgana (about a village) and Talk:Kala Afgana. Is it worth keeping? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources indicate at all that his work is impactful.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See Google search for his name. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 08:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbbarker19: In adding those sources, do you feel like it meets the threshold of notability? Sadads (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 14:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as reliable sources references have been added to the article which shows that the subject passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 11:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Fails to garner non-trivial significant coverage in independent and reliable sources.Let's analyse the references:-
- Ref (1)--No known editorial policy.Fails the requirement of being a reliable source. N
- Ref (2)--Self-declared advocacy site.The mention in the source is trivial.N
- Ref (3)--Clear-cut Sikh Advocacy site.Another trivial mention. N
- Ref (4)--A biography at Site (2).The bio cites a bunch of independent sources except that all of them are used to support general commentary and almost none mentions Afghana. N
- Ref(5)--Reliable source.Mentioned in a list of people who has been excommunicated.?~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.