Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunilla Sköld-Feiler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Certainly no consensus to delete this article. There is ongoing debate about whether the topic is best handled as a standalone article at the current title, or redirected to Snow White and The Madness of Truth. I direct interested editors to the discussion page of the article. Joyous! | Talk 01:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunilla Sköld-Feiler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable fails WP:ARTIST Shrike (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep American Google News search indicates WP:GNG criteria met. Article could use expansion and improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per WP:GNG. Sources are ok. Expansion needed but that is not a reason for deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth per WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOPAGE. The subject seems to be notable only in association with the controversial artwork. The nature of coverage is all about the artwork and hardly gives significant focus on the subject. There is nothing else to show that the subject is independently notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth. I didn't find any information about here, which is not connected to that artwork. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A simple google search would help you. IDONTLIKEIT is irrelevant.BabbaQ (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see me expressing IDONTLIKEIT? And I am capable of simple google search. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth My searches did turn up a few hits on her name, but all of them that I clicked on were about the 2004 Snow White project; even the few more recent articles. For the mostpart, I merely scanned the headlines that came up in a search, and they were about scanned the list of headlines were about Snow White. If she is notable for anything else, or if there are major media profiles of her ouvre on beyond Snow White, flag me and I'll reconsider.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.