Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griefshire
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme 01:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Griefshire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums. Neelix (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NALBUMS. The album has a verifiable Allmusic review. Plenty of attention from gothic metal sources. Faustus37 (talk) 23:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Allmusic review is not by itself sufficient to demonstrate notability per WP:NALBUMS. Where is the attention from gothic metal sources? I haven't found any. Neelix (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 09:12, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 7. Snotbot t • c » 21:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - [1] and [2] are the only two reviews other than Allmusic that I can find. Lukeno94 (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.