Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenometrics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 14:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greenometrics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A disputed prod. No references or sources to demonstrate widespread -- or any -- usage of this protologism; apparently original research; Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no sources and I can't find any; fails WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I should have noted that I did a brief source for references and couldn't find anything applicable. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no references. Likely non-exsistent or coined by its author. —Mizu onna sango15^Hello! 23:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.