Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Protonk (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Coverage in niche publications only. Coldnorthwind (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've just done a quick search and found five full-length reviews of Diesendorf's book [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and three other supporting sources [6] [7] [8]. The book obviously meets Wikipedia:Notability (books). Johnfos (talk) 04:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Johnfos. Bucketsofg 01:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Appears to meet WP:NBOOKS. Seems to have been reviewed in several academic journals. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per WP:NBooks, which it meets on several points. The text is also cited on several sustainability booklists. HarryZilber (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.