Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Lakes Institute of Management

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. No arguments put forward for deletion. No contributors other than the nominator favour deletion. Michig (talk) 07:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great Lakes Institute of Management

Great Lakes Institute of Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How is it that in eight years nobody has managed to turn this into a decent article? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I guess the alumni are too busy to write something about their alma mater. If we delete this, somebody will think of writing a decent article. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Deletion to force improvement is not a valid reason for deletion. Yes, the article needs extensive work. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:34, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was responding to the comment by the nominator. The "reasons" for deletion are obvious, material copied from the institute's web sites and literature, by editors that appear to be employees of the institute. I changed the above vote to a comment. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The subject is notable, and a new editor has gotten involved recently, after the nomination for deletion, and is making improvements. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There is general agreement that accredited degree-awarding educational institutions are notable, as described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. The article has been improved recently. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I have started making changes and improvements to the article - right from rewriting the content to credible referencing (news articles etc.) I will continue doing so and request the deletion request to be taken back. Sushree27 (talk) 07:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.