Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphic Era

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Procedural close, opened by a sockpuppet and no editor has supported their proposal. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic Era

Graphic Era (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn't think that the University pass WP:ORG or WP:N. Some of the references mention the University briefly, but I didn't think that it satisfies the notability requirement of the University. References about notable alumni also didn't confer notability to the University. Page only permotion, Not deepth WP:SIGCOV, not meet WP:GNG. Thank you D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC) - strike sock - Beccaynr (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Uttarakhand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.