Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GraphicStock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to VideoBlocks. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GraphicStock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BOMBARDMENT of sources. But actually the company is not notable at all. All of the sources are trivial mentions. It is WP:TOOSOON Mar11 (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & redirect to VideoBlocks as the parent company. I'm not sure if the latter is notable itself, but seems like a good enough target for now and this would avoid recreation. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as suggested and per WP:CHEAP. Bearian (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.