Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gotta delete em all!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close , malformed nomination.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(View log)

Do we seriously need a list of ALL pokemon species, even ones who are not "rare" or "legendary"?

I propose that all "non legendary" pokemon from the following list be deleted.

Or the very least combine some species. For example, Umbreon, Espeon, Leofeon, Glaceon, Flarion, Vaporion, and all "Evee" evolution lines can be combined with "Eevee" --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 17:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is not clear to someone who doesn't follow Pokemon which exactly you are nominating, and you have also not cited a policy reason for deletion. (I say oppose and not keep because this is really a proposed policy and not a deletion request) Monty₈₄₅ 17:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.