Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorokan High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gorokan High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

• Makes no attempt at establishing notability. Todd661 09:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ~ G1ggy! _{...chatterbox...} 09:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete Would be suitable if it could get some refs, if not then delete per WP:V.Tellyaddict 17:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - empty of content! Not notable. Ibanix 20:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep School's special efforts to assist aboriginal students and its internationally-recognized wind orchestra, all supported by reliable and verifiable sources are an explicit demonstration of notability. Alansohn 02:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Butseriouslyfolks 03:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on the recent substantive additions to the article by Alansohn, specifically the 3rd party recognition of the woodwind orchestra (but not the school's own prospectus or the piece written by the school's principal at Dare to Lead), which satisfy WP:N and WP:V. --Butseriouslyfolks 03:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. High schools are always notable, and this article is also well-sourced. --Carioca 04:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment two external sources / two primary sources... primary sources are on claim that the orchestra is recognised internationally!Garrie 23:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  04:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, musical notability, well-sourced article. Euryalus 04:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Their wind orchestra passes WP:BAND. So write an article about them. The school is not notable outside of the orchestra.Garrie 23:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - high school + substantial secondary sources = notability. TerriersFan 01:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per TerriersFan Noroton 00:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; article provides several minor claims to fame, with sources, and doesnt stray far from the facts in those RS. John Vandenberg 09:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as notability is clearly demonstrated through the abundance of multiple non-trivial third party references. RFerreira 05:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.