Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodie Ibru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Goodie Ibru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Glorified PR article that focuses too closely with not only PR-like information and claims about specifying his career and businesses, but it's actually then not substantially sourced, let alone for notability convincing; my searches are then only finding "news" about mentions, his businesses and then for some apparent law case troubles that led to his being removed from the company positions. Searches at Nigerian newspapers are either mirroring this or not finding anything at all; anything there is here has nothing suggesting the significant improvements we would need, let alone for a nearly notable article. I'll note this has not actually changed since starting over 2 years ago by what seemed to be a likely PR agent. SwisterTwister talk 19:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Results on the subject majorly brings up court issues concerning the ownership of a business venture. Not enough to merit a stand alone article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hotel operator who does not reach the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.