Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Hemp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Hemp

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Many references but nothing in the way of WP:CORPDEPTH. Draft was previously declined through AfC on two occasions. This page was created a day after the last rejection. CNMall41 (talk) 03:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:CORP. I declined the draft as too promotional and this version offends only marginally less. Since the author is forcing the issue, the sources provided lack either the depth or the independence required by the guideline. An independent search for reliable sources brings up routine industry buzz. • Gene93k (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have now made the necessary amendments to the article. Kindly review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Passion d (talk • contribs) 09:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Both article and draft have been speedily deleted per CSD G5 (works of a sockpuppet). I'll leave it to an uninvolved editor to close this AfD. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.