Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; the page was copy-pasted from draftspace by a non-EC editor (WP:GS/RUSUKR)‎. Prolog (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzalo Lira

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wondered when he would come back, non-notable as in the last two or three AfD's. Minor mentions in publications, non-notable films. Oaktree b (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Chile. Oaktree b (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete no evidence he’s somehow become more notable since the last time.—-Ermenrich (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete Gonzalo Lira is a notable person because he was imprisoned by the Ukrainian police, for only using his freedom of speech. Imprisonment of political opponents by the Ukrainian government and the Western world, is notable, and therefore this article should not be deleted. It's a First amendment right: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." *:Nybygger (talk) 04:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't Congress, we can't pass laws. He isn't American. Please re-read the article on the first amendment, it's not applicable here. Oaktree b (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTABILITY is established by coverage in WP:reliable sources, not by the fact that something is in the first amendment or you think it's important. There is no evidence that mainstream reliable sources outside the pro-Russian information bubble care about this man.--Ermenrich (talk) 12:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is the 4th time in AfD, I'd salt liberally if this goes towards deletion, again. Oaktree b (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.