Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonçalo da Silveira Foundation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 13:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gonçalo da Silveira Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, promo The Banner talk 11:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral - written in a promotional manner, but can probably be fixed. I would suggest moving to draft. Deb (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- delete No sign of coverage independent sources. I could be persuaded to change my mind if sources were forthcoming. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 03:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete for now but move to draft. This can be a notable subject however there is no immediate sign if notability and the tone is also promotional. GenuineArt (talk) 04:57, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.