Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoldenPalace.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GoldenPalace.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly suspicious subject not meeting WP:NCORP with bad non reliable sources. Mambo Rumbo (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep more than enough coverage of the "publicity stunts", the woman that tattooed their website on her forehead for example. We could probably cobble together enough sources for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 13:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Netherlands. Shellwood (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Part of a rapid-fire mass nomination of gambling companies with zero WP:BEFORE diligence. Toohool (talk) 22:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.