Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoldenDict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GoldenDict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded, then restored, currently not enough sources to pass WP:GNG or WP:VERIFY, and searches did not turn up enough to show it meets notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not seeing anything which would show meeting GNG nor NSOFTWARE. Ping Shenlebantongying who requested this be undeleted. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 20:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  There are so ___MANY___ softwares on wikipedia pages mainly citing the main website marked as something something something. What's wrong with that? Unless there are a lot of dramas involved with the software, then all of them won't have a lot of citations from else where.

  There are a lot of mentions on web and some papaers on google scholar, but they are mostly unrelated to be part of wiki.

  Why you are so hurry? Not everyone have time to edit wiki like you. Just wait. slbtty (talk) 01:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Well it's been 5 days and still no updates. I'm not seeing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 18:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Pure PROMO. Best source I could find was the MacRuorsForum, which isn't acceptable sourcing, then it falls off a cliff. Delete for lack of any kind of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 02:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.