Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gohma
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge summarized content into Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series and delete the rest. These articles fail many of the criteria at WP:FICT, and Wikipedia is not a guide to all things Zelda (or any other game or fictional work). I've tried to incorporate a representative piece of each article into the more general Enemies one; editors who would like access to the deleted material for the purpose of doing a more extensive rewrite may contact me on my talk page. As a side note, the material seems to have been preserved at http://egamia.com/wiki/ . Tijuana Brass (talk) 07:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This applies to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octorok, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moblin, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gohma, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizalfos, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poe (The Legend of Zelda), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalfos and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizzrobe.
Gohma
The article is just a regurgitation of the character and gameplay sections of several Legend of Zelda game articles. Since the creature in question has no notability, the article is just an in-universe duplication of elements of other articles and provides no encyclopedic coverage. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:FICT for fictional characters. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it lacks real-world notability. - Koweja (talk) 18:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series, however do significant cutting. Knowitall (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.