Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goblin Cock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Overwhelming consensus that the band is both notable and the article can be verified. --Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 11:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goblin Cock

Goblin Cock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Has released only one record on minor label, has gone on one sub-national tour, and gets insufficient press coverage so that it does not meet WP:BAND; previously speedied twice, but this time at least asserts notability . JChap2007 01:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Source or delete. MER-C 03:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment no feelings on this either way, but anyone who wishes to keep this can start here and rewrite this article. --jaydj 04:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I've changed my mind because of these news archive hits, but someone needs to cite these. --jaydj 04:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I've added one item of note, with source. One member is in notable band. --Savant45 08:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep on the grounds that somehow I have this on my iTunes and I have no idea how, since I don't even like this kind of music. So that can't be all that obscure. Ford MF 09:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral. I'd like to say Keep this article but much of the sources I've looked at are only passing mentions, there's no full, proper reviews in any of the papers. There are an awful lot of passing mentions though, and one member is in a notable band (as defined by WP:NMG) so I'm unable to be swayed either way at this time. --Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 11:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Poor article, but a quick google search throws up more than enough info to assert notability. And the name made me laugh :p JMalky 13:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, Rob Crow is in it. Verifiable, notable. Recury 14:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, notable guy, verifiability established. Terence Ong 14:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Interesting band name, to say the least, but nevertheless a Google search establishes notability and verifiability. JRHorse 19:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per jrhorse.Bakaman 19:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep needs to be sourced and re-written, but does pass the notability. SkierRMH 21:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep per Skier. Just H 01:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please this band is notable and has many sources available too Yuckfoo 02:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable band. I'll help out on the rewrite, as I was thinking of creating this article myself. Good band to check out if you're into Black Sabbath style metal. --Joelmills 02:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]