Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go! Puzzle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Red Phoenix ^talk 19:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Go! Puzzle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Exists, but how does it meet WP:NOTABILITY?~~ Boleyn (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 18:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak keep – This downloadable game has been reviewed in several notable gaming magazines and websites, including at least one substantial and lengthy review in Eurogamer. I am unsure whether these reviews alone are sufficient coverage for this game to be covered by a standalone article though, so I am definitely open to arguments in favor of deleting this. Ealuscerwen (talk) 16:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can't justify a deletion here, not with four WP:VG/RS sources covering it in a non-trivial way: GameSpot [1], Eurogamer [2], Engadget [3], and IGN [4], and per Metacritic there seems to be even more coverage in magazines. That should be enough to meet WP:GNG in my eyes. If I look at a WP:ATD merge, it's impossible, since two teams worked on this game (both with wiki articles). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP It gets significant coverage by reliable sources. such as https://www.ign.com/articles/2007/06/29/go-puzzle-review-2 and what others have mentioned and what's linked to in the article already. Dream Focus 03:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per helpful comments above. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.