Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glutamate permease

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Academic Challenger (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glutamate permease

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't have sufficient notability TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A quick google search convinced me that this is a thing that is studied seriously in microbiology. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It certainly needs vast improvement and removal of stub-status, but I'd hardly call that a reason for deletion, especially when, per above, it does exist and has real-life implications. -User:Учхљёная ^{(talk,philosophy,edits)}. 02:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Updated and added a few refs. WP:BEFORE next time. (Also, this ought to be at the recommended name for the protein, sodium/glutamate symporter, but I guess after the AfD.) Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:26, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Can the nominator expand on his reasons for deletion? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Please provide specific reasons this protein does not have notability. Natureium (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.