Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glorianna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Quest for Glory. Cirt (talk) 01:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glorianna

Article subject doesn't have any notability, and hasn't been improved in months. A large chunk of it is also game guide material. The parent game article will be unaffected by its removal. Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. VG ☎ 12:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Quest for Glory. Corvus cornix_talk 21:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Quest for Glory where most of the relevant information already exists in a concise form. Randomran (talk) 21:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Glorianna Davenport, just to be contrary. Nifboy (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Originally, I was going to suggest a redirect to Elizabeth I of England. Corvus cornix_talk 22:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - If we're going to go that route Gloriana would be a better target. Or maybe a disambig? Nifboy (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agreee with the deletion suggestion.The Gazel Ministry (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.