Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Warning Tour

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Warning Tour

Global Warning Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • strong keep it has references and had ninth largest crowd ever and its the biggest thing Professional wrestling or WWE has ever done in Australia 08:32, 16 November 2016‎ User:Pidzz
Prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.27.47.150 (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Um, there were plenty of notable individual pro wrestling events which weren't offered on pay-per-view, especially considering that supercards predate PPV by many decades. This particular controversy appears to be an outgrowth of longstanding OWN/POV issues perpetuated by certain editors at Professional wrestling in Australia. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An event doesn't have to be on PPV to pass WP:GNG but it does have to pass GNG to get an article. This event happens to have not been on PPV and it also happens to not to pass GNG.LM2000 (talk) 00:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. LM2000 (talk) 08:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete and salt This has been deleted multiple times, so therefore WP:G4 is applied. Also, please salt every article listed above. Nickag989talk 17:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.