Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Hotel Alliance (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Hotel Alliance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the references are own web-site of affiliated hotels. Massive COI in editing this article. No independent refs . Fails WP:CORP Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Clean Up We need to block all COI editing, thoroughly edit or redraft this and it would probably be worthy of inclusion. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep However I agree this badly needs a cleanup as there is a lot of puffery and obvious COI edits. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG, The above !voters are correct in that the article does need a cleanup however no one above has addressed the notability (or lack of) of the subject..... The cites are all "about us" on different websites, Nothing substantial and nothing worth keeping this article over. –Davey2010^Talk 23:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this suggests better for the applicable notability and the listed sources are certainly not impressive. Delete and restart is best instead of hoping for improvements to be made. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Here are some sources about the 2004 establishment of this large hotel affinity program: New Straits Times [1]; International Herald Tribune [2]; Hotels [3]; The Age [4]; Gulf Business (re 2013 HQ move to Dubai)[5]. HighBeam has 100+ hits, most of which are probably press releases but at least a few seem to be substantive business news reports. A decent small article could be crafted out of all this, and would be worth retaining. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.