Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glass paint
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice to the creation of a sourced article about glass painting Shimeru (talk) 01:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Glass paint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to originally have been created as an advertisement for a specific vendor's process. With the removal of the spammy content, the article now seems to lack a subject. I would recommend it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A1 except that it has had too many hands in it to really qualify for speedy. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:28, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename. Glass painting is a notable subject that doesn't have its own article and should. Szzuk (talk) 21:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes, but there is already an article on that topic at Reverse glass painting. This article covers a significantly different topic, I believe. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. The information on 'glass paint' and 'reverse glass painting' should be merged into a new article - 'glass painting'. Its not clear if a delete or redirect would be best for this afd. Its an awkward tidy up. Szzuk (talk) 06:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article is an artifact from an attempt at advertising. Jminthorne (talk) 06:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: Article should be merged with the appropriate article. White Trillium (talk) 03:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete...it's still spammy. The content in this article and the content at Back painted glass (also worth deleting) have been created by Chrissommer36 (talk · contribs) (presumably the new account of Glasspaint (talk · contribs), now blocked as a COI username). These accounts and IPs 74.233.95.207 (talk · contribs) [note these two edits] & 98.64.173.173 (talk · contribs) are heavily focused on the promotion of certain links, which may need to be blacklisted, also targeting Glass coloring and color marking. I think there is probably room for an article on the art of painting on glass, something with which Reverse glass painting could be merged, but I think it should start fresh. As this doesn't provide any reliable sources, it's merely uncited advertorial content. — Scientizzle 19:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.