Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginger Gonzaga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ginger Gonzaga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON; no gnews hits for her acting (some local media mentions of success in student speech competitions circa 2000.) Nat Gertler (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page needs to go. It seems the creator of the page is a fan of The Morning After and has also created a stub for Brian Kimmet. As the editor of The Morning After page, I have found nothing to make either Brian or Ginger notable in an encyclopedic way. ComposerDude ^(TALKIE)_*contribs 16:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- - Agreed - delete. Reichsfürst (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless WP:RS can be found. Bearcat (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like you and the merry little band of shifty, faceless buereucrats to know that I won't go down without a fight. I stand for FREEDOM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowledge227 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am hoping for you guys. In your pursuit of ascent on this buereaucratic ladder you have lost your ways. Who is to determine what is notable or not notable? Is the simple action of taking a breath or blinking an eye notable? An hour of wolves and shattered shields when the Age of Men comes crashing down, but it is not this day! This day we fight! By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand!---Yours Truly, Very Concerned

Plus you are NOT a true fan of the Morning After — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowledge227 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for bureaucrat... can I get a bureaucrat in here? Preferably one missing a face. And with masterful powers of deletion. Knowledge227, encyclopedic content must be notable, which means a major impact on human events that people have taken note of. It must be reliably sourced, which is to say if a verifiable reference cannot be found to vet the subjects notability, it is still not notable. Brian Kimmet is very talented. So is my sister, who's a nurse. Neither of them are notable... yet. They're just talented. ComposerDude ^(TALKIE)_*contribs 20:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Because I want to hold the people down...especially when they can't source their article, and the subject doesn't meet WP:N. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.