Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilo Muirragui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, without prejudice against recreation if some reliable sources are found. Mojo Hand (talk) 05:59, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gilo Muirragui

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced biography. From the stated facts (senior economist at IMF for 20 years) it seems to meet notability criteria, but then again it is unsourced. bender235 (talk) 17:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As they retired in 1989, nothing can be found on internet about this person except mirrors of the WP article and the one link to an article that they themselves had written. There is a minute mention of their name inside a reference in this article which seems to have been taken from a self-written article that had been published on www.vheadlines.com but is now a dead link too. The IMF website doesn't mention them either, probably also because they had retired in 1989. To establish notability, someone will need access to paper where his name is mentioned as being in the capacity that is claimed in the article. It is of no use whatsoever to research this person on the internet. - Takeaway (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 08:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears not to pass WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant independent coverage. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 21:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - with no prejudice against recreation if historical, off-line coverage (sufficient to pass WP:GNG) comes to light. St★lwart¹¹¹ 11:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.