Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giftano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Giftano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rather promotional article, sourced to press releases and listicles - can't find any sourcing that would satisfy CORPDEPTH, so fails NCORP. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pretty obvious promotional article for a start up failing WP:NCORP. Created by WP:SPA, pretty WP:DUCK obvious case of WP:PAID WP:COI as usual, in other words, WP:SPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP founded in 2014 it is upcoming at best not notable at this point.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.