Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gift Grub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 20:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gift Grub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable; sources define notability for Mario Rosenstock, who has an article, not this subject. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to The Ian Dempsey Breakfast Show per lead. Segment on a presumably notable show, but no evidence of standalone notability for Gift Grub; Youtube videos do not establish notability. Further, no argument for a split as the show's article is remarkably short. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 17:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Merge and redirect to The Ian Dempsey Breakfast Show#Gift Grub or similar section. The subject's notability seems inexorably tied to Mario Rosenstock and The Ian Dempsey Breakfast Show. The latter being a more natural/appropriate target. Unless cited, the "notable sketches" (and other uncited/editorial content) should likely not be retained/merged. Guliolopez (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Updating my !vote to "keep". Upon reflection, review and further interrogation of the sources, my view has changed. I think that there probably are enough sources dealing with the subject "in its own right". Independent of the people and radio show with which it is most associated. Guliolopez (talk) 10:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. A quick google search reveals a lot of hits for significant coverage Gift Grub from relevant sources (one two three four five six to start with) - however I don't understand your need to establish notability by finding articles that don't reference Rosenstock's existence. It's surely akin to defining any sort of book series by its notability without mentioning its author and aside from WP:INHERITED (which doesn't apply here) I can't find any wikipolicies about it! ser! (let's discuss it). 22:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per Ser! It has received some coverage, notably the ones indicated above. Though the article needs a little clean up, it's good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There is enough non trivial coverage from multiple reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article needs improvement but the topic is notable enough. Gramscis cousin^Talk_Stalk 14:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.