Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghugni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghugni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single reference yet C E (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like a recipe, no assertion of notability, and no citations/references. Only reason i did not speedy delete it was somebody suggested a merge. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have copy edited the article, and removed the recipe as per WP:NOTRECIPE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep – Meets WP:GNG, albeit on the weak side from what I can find in available online sources. This is a very common dish in Kolkata, and it's likely that more offline sources exist that cover this topic. Source examples include: Poughkeepsie Journal and this book source. Additional options include merging to Chotpoti and/or List of Indian dishes. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - This is a very common dish in eastern India but finding reliable sources might be difficult. It is a type of curry and is also known as "Guguni". Lakun.patra (talk) 11:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.