Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD concern was Does not pass WP:NORG; I was not able to find any independent, secondary sources addressing this primary school directly and in significant detail.

Challenged with reason The article have a link from govt website so this article should be in wikipedia. It should not be deleted Website govt website

These sources show that this primary school exists but it does not show anything near the level of sourcing required to pass NORG. It's not even enough to pass WP:GNG. This fails on WP:ORGDEPTH, which requires that Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - primary schools are usually non-notable, and this one looks to be no exception. The cited sources, being mostly entries in databases, do not help to establish notability under the GNG, and my searches find no substantial coverage. I'm also not finding a logical place to redirect to. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep

Hello @Spiderone: first of all I didn't challenge. I just said that the article have a source from govt website. The article have reference on govt website so that is why I told you that this article should not be deleted. That's it. Now all I can say if admin think that this article should be on wikipedia then they will keep and if admin thik that this article should be deleted then they will delete. I'll accept whatever decision they take. Thank you

• Delete We have decided that primary schools need an actual show of notability to keep the article. Wikipedia aims at covering notable things, not everything. Just because a government website can verify something exists does not mean we should have an article on it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-notable primary school. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.