Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gheema-roobock
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gheema-roobock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject profoundly lacks notability. Malatinszky (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Whole-heartedly agree with nominator, this is a ridiculous "group" (the picture says it all) that probably thought it'd be funny to post something on WP. Miserably fails WP:N. Angryapathy (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy A7. No assertion of notability. Appropriate tag added. Tevildo (talk) 21:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.