Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghandour Cosmetics Limited (cosmetics company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ghandour Cosmetics Limited (cosmetics company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company - not seeing anything here that would satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH.

Abandoned draft: [1]. KH-1 (talk) 02:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ghana. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as articles that rely entirely on quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews, website information, etc - even when slightly modified. Here, none of the references meet the criteria and I'm unable to locate any that does. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The closest source I found not already in the article is an article about the appointment of a brand ambassador, and that simply does not qualify. Also, I can't see where ref 9 (le Faso) mentions the article subject? Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.