Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Outta My Face

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Get Outta My Face

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A tricky one, hence sitting in CAT:NN for over 11 years. It is hard for a non-specialist to know what is and isn't a reliable source in this area. It has some coverage, but not the in-depth coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG and doesn't meet any other part of WP:NOTABILITY that I could find. Boleyn (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. - Flori4nK ^{t • c} 14:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For video games, there is a specialized search engine found via WP:VG/SE for only reliable sources. Of course, not all reliable sources are covered by this engine, but it is expansive enough to give off the general feel for notability. Using this engine, one can find three sources: an interview, a press release, and a database entry (on a website specializing in arcade games). While all three are reliable, the first two are not independent (one of the primary) and the last one is not authored, so none of them count towards notability. Hence, the topic fails WP:GNG and WP:NVG. IceWelder [✉] 15:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.