Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Bucked

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Note that there are articles on singles off of this album, that may need deletion as well (Get 'Em Buck, I Know You Want Me, 4 Kings); one of them has a citation so I'm not going to delete them directly, but rather prod them. Use regular prod procedures to contest or upgrade to AFD. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-10 20:38Z

Update. The article Buck the World had not been properly tagged, so I have undeleted it and nominated it separately. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buck the World (3rd nomination). —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 07:42Z

Get Bucked

Pages included in this listing: Buck the World, Get Bucked

This article does not contain any verifiable content. My suggestion is to delete per WP:V unless reliable sources can be provided, as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Buck the World, which is the correct page. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 02:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in agreement with the previous assessment. --Haemo 03:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The album has a release date, but the data is confusing. One should be redirected depending on the truth, and I'm concerned here because Get Bucked seems to be a lot of unsourced OR. Either redirect to Buck The World (which seems to be the correct path), or if indeed the article is to be named Get Bucked, transplant the contents from BTW into Get Bucked and redirect that. Either way, *Merge and Redirect. --Dennisthe2 06:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (without actually coping any content) and Redirect to Buck the World as the real page is nice and sourced, but this page is screaming and contains identical information.--CastAStone|^(talk) 17:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you please clarify what you mean by "nice and sourced"? The page you suggest redirecting to also fails to cite any reliable sources. (jarbarf) 20:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and delete the Buck the World page as well, which is not reliably sourced as far as I can see. (jarbarf) 18:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom, no reliable sources are cited in either article. RFerreira 08:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources... ALKIVAR™ ☢ 08:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --DanielCD 20:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Maybe somebody can bother to check the website for the label? The label seems pretty notable, just starting, is part of Universal, and is operated by 50 Cent. I'm not all that big (read: not at all) on hip hop, but last I heard, 50 cent is pretty danged notable, so if he's signed on that label, I'd guess that the label has at least some info. --Dennisthe2 00:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The official website for this artist, www.g-unitsoldier.com, makes no mention of this album. I agree that if something verifiable could be produced it would then be worth noting. (jarbarf) 00:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.