Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetConnected

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GetConnected

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a "television, podcast and radio show", not reliably sourced as the subject of any significant media coverage for the purposes of clearing WP:TVSHOW. The primary notability claim here is that it was nominated for, but did not win, a regional film and television award, referenced only to that award's self-published website about itself -- but regional awards aren't instant notability clinchers if they're self-sourcing, because we still need media coverage about the awards in order to establish that they even have sufficient notability to bestow upon their nominees in the first place. And otherwise, this is more or less written like somebody tried to convert its closing credits scroll into prose ("past cohosts include [insert extremely long list of non-notable permanent redlinks here]") without ever actually showing any sourcing for any of that content either. There's just nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to show much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The page looks untidy. Since it has 3 categories, there's a single source for 2 of them each. The other sources I found are only passing mentions about the show. Fails WP:GNG. _SUPER ^ASTIG 23:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.