Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German intervention against ISIL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German intervention against ISIL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a clear case of WP:CRYSTALBALL, when users create a military conflict page, based solely on a single declaration. So far, not even a single German soldier or ship or airplane has participated in the effort against ISIL. It is not even clear if there will be. So Germany announced it will join Operation Inherent Resolve, so what? Nothing happened so far to justify such a page. GreyShark (dibra) 17:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The military operation will start in 2016. Stefanomione (talk) 17:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. On 10 December 2015, forty personnel and two Tornados flew to Incirlik. Gavbadger (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets GNG easily —Мандичка^YO 😜 10:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The clear announcement of military intervention already constitutes an intervention by itself. Though the article fails to point that out, Germany has already intervened before by providing the Iraqi Peshmerga with weapons and training them. PanchoS (talk) 17:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No valid reason given for deletion: this topic is clearly notable Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agree fully with the above. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the topic appears to be notable, and I would imagine that the commencement of operations will result in the article being expanded. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.