Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German Unification Wars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unification of Germany. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 15:16, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

German Unification Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

coverage included in Unification of Germany. Everything there is fully sourced. This is duplicated, and largely unsourced. auntieruth (talk) 15:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - Nom is correct. The content within is fairly limited, and is smaller than even the summary sections in Unification of Germany. Additionally that article has major contentforks to each individual component of this article. Even if this was expanded it would be serving as an unwarranted duplicative article. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per nom and above editor. Bakazaka (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom, a clear WP:CFORK. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom and above. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom, due to this article being a WP:CFORK and basically duplicating an existing article. JC7V-constructive zone 16:29, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect this looks like an unnecessary CFORK. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes Redirect -- The target covers the same ground but better. An alternative might be to reduce it to a list article, providing a means of reference to the articles on the individual wars, but most people would look for a category first. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - the case argued above for this is well founded. The Unification of Germany article covers this and separate article is not needed. Dunarc (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. Adamtt9 (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.