Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgian Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Georgian Wikipedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page does not indicate why the site is important, notable or should have its own page. The page was recreated with no rationale[1], I want to consider that "Georgian Wikipedia is important because I say it is important" was the argument, but no summary was used, so I reserve the right of speculation. Fails WP:WEB: it has no sources, no evidence that this wiki is important to have its own article, their site about their Wikipedia does not indicate their importance either, and this has been discussed in the past at WT:Wikipedia. If the site "has reached 10,000 article threshold" it can be mentioned at List of Wikipedias once the list mentions the number of articles each Wikipedia has. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:48, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Wikipedias, since it has just over 58,000 articles.—S Marshall T/C 22:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per S Marshall, there's nothing that makes this Wikipedia notable on its own. Ducknish (talk) 00:22, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.