Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Kubini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:57, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

George Kubini

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a person who seems to be really only known for one thing. The article seems to fall into the issue of WP:NOTNEWS, the references used are either that of government agencies or a rehashes of the same press release/court reporting. The article is more a synopsis of the court case then the person himself. This fails to meet the threshold in WP:GNG McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with the nominator. Rap Chart Mike (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not every personaccused of property fraud is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per norminator. Lapablo (talk) 21:35, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.