Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Stadtmüller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Stadtmüller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N in general and WP:ACADEMIC in particular Sulmuesi (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Since he was elected for president of History department on Munich University he can not fail nor WP:N in general nor WP:ACADEMIC. "The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society." I am main contributor to the article. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~Comment. GS cites seems to give h index = 7. Not enough for WP:Prof#C1. Highest level refers to President or Vice Chancellor. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Keep (weakish, but keep nonetheless). Googlescholar is notoriously bad in getting citations in humanities, especially for someone who wrote in pre-internet era (he dies in 1985). GoogleBooks results are significant[1]. Most of the sources are in German, so I can't make out very well what is what there, but this[2] seems to be a festschrift for his 65th birthday. There are bio-pages about him at Leipzig University[3] and at the Hungarian Institute in Munich[4] (see section IV there) where he seems to have been a Director at some point. This[5] (pp. IX-XI) seems to be a published bio article about him. More digging is required, preferably by someone who knows German, but the subject seems to pass WP:PROF and WP:BIO to me. Nsk92 (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: because of this biography/obituary and its content - which seems to indicate sufficient evidence of notability - stressing his importance and regard with which he and his work are held by those in the German speaking studies of some parts of SE europe. [6] (Msrasnw (talk) 01:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.