Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Leib

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Time to close after 3+ weeks. Obviously, there won't be more people participating in this discussions so I'm going to close this as No Consensus. This can always be returned to AFD at another time. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Leib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very few references, does not appear to follow notability guidelines Gtag10 (talk) 23:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. He has a biographical entry in this academic reference work: Werner Ebnet (2016). "Leib, Georg". Sie haben in München gelebt: Biografien aus acht Jahrhunderten. Allitera Verlag. p. 363. ISBN 9783869069111. That's the only SIGCOV I could find, but I do think it indicates that the subject has sustaining notability given that a 2016 reference work is writing about him more than a hundred years after his death. I also think its likely that there are more German language references on this person and that SIGCOV could be met if better searchers than myself participate (searching in German isn't a strong skill set of mine).4meter4 (talk) 20:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.