Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geetha Parameswaran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geetha Parameswaran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly NN academic with unremarkable list of published papers. This article was previously nominated for CSD/A7 and prod-ed twice for similar reasons. Toddst1 (talk) 20:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One reasonably well cited paper ("Corrosion inhibition of mild steel in hydrochloric acid solution by Schiff base furoin thiosemicarbazone") but it's not enough by itself to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1, and I don't see anything else. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage in any third-party sources. utcursch | talk 18:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.