Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geetanjali Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geetanjali Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted under WP:CSD#A7. Fails WP:GNG. — Jeff G. ツ 09:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Jeff G. ツ 09:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I believe the subject passes WP:GNG, with several articles dedicated to her, including at least 2 Times of India articles. The page does need some work, though. (Personally, I think a nomination argument of failing WP:NACTOR would have been more compelling; however, she did appear in all 269 episodes of the Indian soap opera, Tumhari Paakhi, and she starred in the Bollywood film, Falsafa: The Other Side. She also appears to have had some minor success as a model.) Dflaw4 (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Dflaw4. _SUPER ^ASTIG 16:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've now added a couple of sources to the article. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.