Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gedaliah Finkel

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gedaliah Finkel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources. —swpbT 13:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 13:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 13:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of "sources" in the article at present w/r/t GNG:

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20131014055511/http://heichalaryeh.org/staff.htm No Institution that employs the subject ~ Very little coverage No
https://www.google.co.il/search?q=%22%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99+%D7%92%D7%93%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%94%22 value not understood No This is just a Google search, not a source at all No No
http://www.chareidi.org/archives5765/YSR65arcarlbach.htm ? ? No Trivial mention No
http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/791173/rabbi-gedaliah-finkel/hesped-for-harav-nosson-tzvi-finkel-ztz-l/ ? ? No No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

swpbT 13:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.