Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GanttProject (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GanttProject (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was kept in 2009 after numerous previous deletions, but it has never attracted a single non-trivial independent source. Everything I can find is either affiliated, a download site, or a directory. There are a handful of mentions in dead-tree books, but nothing substantive in any that I can access. Guy (help! - typo?) 19:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nomination, no significant coverage, no notability shown. Artem.G (talk) 08:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as this article is not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is about the best I could find [1], from what appears to be a pay to play website. Oaktree b (talk) 22:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.