Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangplank Galleon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete the lot Courcelles 00:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gangplank Galleon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Trivial level from a computer game. QU ^TalkQu 21:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

100% Delete very non-notable. CTJF83 chat 22:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. See also Crocodile Cauldron and Krem Quay: good candidates for adding to this AFD.
Delete Completely devoid of notability and lacks content, "article" is just a sentence. --Elassint (talk) 02:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. These articles don't even qualify for WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. I would normally suggest merging them all to Donkey Kong Country 2: Diddy's Kong Quest, but that article doesn't even mention the names of the worlds (well, a couple of them are mentioned, but only in passing). Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's also the final boss level in Donkey Kong Country. But that still doesn't make it notable. Reach Out to the Truth 16:55, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Gangplank Galleon to Donkey Kong Country#Audio. May be a plausible search term as far as the soundtrack for Donkey Kong Country is concerned, though clearly not notable enough even for its own article (note that there is information about the Donkey Kong Country soundtrack itself, which I would recommend be in that section). –MuZemike 19:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you redirect a world to the audio?! CTJF83 chat 00:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's also the name of one of the more popular tracks in the game's soundtrack. –MuZemike 02:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since this AfD is where the largest discussion is taking place, I'm moving all the related article AfDs here and closing the other ones. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - no independent notability from the game(s). Doesn't pass WP:GNG. --Teancum (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect All to the game page. As per MuZemike, some might be plausible search terms for the game soundtrack - or for the game in general. IF the articles' author thinks there is enough content, he could pad out the game article with some info about the levels (while being careful not to write a guide) - but none of them are able to assert notability enough to warrant their own article. -Addionne (talk) 12:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, my redirect !vote was for Gangplank Galleon only; I don't see the others being much of a search term, though, and all the AFDs I see were merged into one since then. I would hence probably support outright deletion of all the others. –MuZemike 15:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all others except Gangplank Galleon, which I already have suggested a redirect, per my comment directly above. –MuZemike 15:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in that the levels of a videogame are not independently notable, although Level 4 of Ms. Pac-Man was kind of cool. None of these even had anything interesting to say, basically "this is the --th level of a game" and the implied "buy it and play it to find out what's there". I don't see a reason for a redirect at all-- if you know that you're on the level called "Gangplank Galleon", but you forgot that the game you're playing is Donkey Kong Country 2, time to go outside and get some fresh air. Mandsford 14:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. None of these articles assert notability. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.