Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gambitious

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Symbid. Swarm we ♥ our hive 07:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gambitious

Gambitious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no notability. None of the sources are sufficiently reliable. DGG ( talk ) 13:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 01:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 01:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not an abundant offering, and not much coverage after 2012, but enough significant coverage for a small article based on reliable reporting. There are also more duplicate refs available, but I felt that this covered it. – czar 04:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe draft/userfy instead as I considered the sources found and the ones I found including here and here but, as it seems there hasn't been much recent activity, I'm not sure what the future plans are. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Symbid‎. Notable at it's launch, but now Gambitious is a subsidiary of Symbid and not all that notable by itself.--Nowa (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Symbid. Nothing really to be merged in. Page should be deleted and redirected. The content about Gambitious on the Symbid is already just as substantial and written in a much more encyclopedic tone. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.