Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gage Marshall
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete . I'm calling WP:SPEEDY#A7 on this one. There's no compelling indication of importance in the article. Marasmusine (talk) 20:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gage Marshall
- Gage Marshall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources currently in the article are either primary sources or, as with [1] does not even mention the person. Moreover, I could not find any other coverage about this person while doing a couple of basic searches. Notability is not established. –MuZemike 20:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) –MuZemike 20:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —–MuZemike 20:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:BIO, can't find usable coverage for this person. --Teancum (talk) 13:57, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Why are we even debating this? It's obvious that it was created by a 15-year-old about himself - and was immediately set upon by vandals, probably his friends. I refuse to assume good faith here; I think they are just playing games, using Wikipedia as their template. There is zero verification; the only sources that actually mention the subject are his blog and his twitter account. --MelanieN (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.