Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GTspirit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn to allow time for improvements. (non-admin closure) Goodvac (talk) 00:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GTspirit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find anything that proves its notability, therefore fails WP:WEB, does not have any reliable third party sources to prove so otherwise. I am willing to withdraw this nomination if anybody proves me wrong otherwise. Donnie Park (talk) 16:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as the creator of this page I was wonder what can be done to the content to improve it so that the article is deleted ?

I was also wondering in what way the content and sources differ from other similar websites wiki pages (e.g. Jalopnik?) I use Jalopnik as an example as it's article mainly sources from Jalopnik itself, similar to this page.

How would you go about references printed articles in magazine's? As the collaboration between GTspirit and prestigecars.de sees one of their road reviews printed in prestigecars magazine every quarterly issue. User:Dave logic (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth considering the notability guidelines of WP:WEB and get your article to meet these guidelines, articles survive them because they follow these guidelines. Donnie Park (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One the other hand, I am withdrawing this nomination to give the editor time to meet notability criterias. Donnie Park (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.